VRAN: A Canadian Vaccination Information Network

 
   


 


JOIN VRANS NETWORK
MEMBERSHIP

HEPATITIS-B LINKS

HEP-B VACCINE: A HEALTH HAZARD

DR. MARC GIRARD MD: ON HEPATITIS B VACCINE

PEDIATRIC HEPATITIS B VACCINATION

EXCERPT OF Dr. B. DUNBAR'S SPEECH

Dr BONNIE DUNBAR - RESEARCH PROPOSAL

ADVERSE REACTION TESTIMONIAL LETTERS

HEP-B PAMPHLET

NVIC ON HEP-B

QUESTIONABLE VALUE OF VACCINE

AAPS-REPORT TO THE US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NIGHTINGALE PRESS RELEASE

HEP-B & CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME

CMA SAYS NO TO MANDATORY HEP-B FOR MD"s

HEP-B VACCINE LINKED TO DIABETES

MEDICAL JOURNALS LINKING HEP-B TO HEALTH ISSUES

VACCINE BRAIN DAMAGE

ARTICLES & LINKS

GENERAL ISSUES

ANAPHYLAXIS

ARTICLES OF INTEREST

AUTISM

DOCTORS FOR VACCINE TRUTH

HISTORICAL

MERCURY /THIMEROSAL

SHAKEN BABY

SIDS /CRIB DEATH

VITAMIN C

VACCINE INJURY COMPENSATION

VACCINE INGREDIENTS

ANIMAL HEALTH & VACCINES

SPECIFIC VACCINES

ANTHRAX

CHICKEN POX

DIPHTHERIA, TETANUS, & PERTUSSIS

HEPATITIS-B

HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS

INFLUENZA

MENINGITIS

MEASLES, ,MUMPS, RUBELLA (MMR)

PNEUMOCOCCAL

POLIO

ROTAVIRUS

SMALLPOX

FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE


Download the latest Acrobat Reader to read VRAN's pdf files

NEED TO READ OUR PDF FILES? GET THE LATEST VERSION NOW.

Your VRAN Membership or Literature purchases can be made through PayPal

Free Web Page Hit Counters
 Free Web Site Counter


Online Degrees

VACCINES:    SUMMARY OF REPORT OF HEPATITIS-B VACCINE

Table 1. Representative Reports of Extrahepatic Adverse Reactions to Hepatitis B virus infection.

Adverse Reaction/Diagnosis Reference

Systemic "Lupoid hepatitis", Systemic lupus erythematosus Borisova and Krel, 1992;
Chng et al., 1993;
Arthritis (polyarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis) McCarty and Ormiste, 1973;
Gocke, D., 1975;
Duffy et al., 1976;
Onion et al., 1971;
Wands et al., 1975;
Chistau and Helin, 1987;
Morris and Stevens, 1978;
Pease and Keat, 1985;
Tsukada et al., 1987;
Vascular Disorders (Vasculitis, polyarteritis, erythema nodosum) Gocke, D., 1975;
Sargent et al., 1976;
Duffy et al., 1976;
repo et al., 1974;
Michalak, 1977;
Maggiore, 1983;
Di Giusto and Bernhard, 1986;
Tsukada et al., 1987;
Rogerson and Nye, 1990;
Guillin Barre Syndrome Neirmeijer and Gips, 1975;
Penner et al., 1982Tsukada et al., 1987;
Tabor et al., 1987;
Demyelinating disorders (optic neuritis, demyelinating neouropathy etc.) Galli et al., 1986;
Tsukada et al., 1987;
Inoue et al., 1994;
Achiron, 1994;
Chronic Fatigue Berelowitz et al., 1995;
Glomerulonephritis Venkataseshan et al., 1990.

2. Role of MHC genes in autoimmune disorders.

There is substantial evidence that there are strong associations between autoimmune disorders and MHC molecules (See reviews by Paul, 1987; Abbas, 1994). In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) the presence of HLA-DR2 or HLA-DR3 haplotypes is associated with a relative risk which is doubled if both are present (Mackworth-Young and Schwartz (1988). Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory polyarthritis which has a strong association with MHC Class II molecules, although the concordance of disease occurs at only 15% in monozygotic twins suggesting that environmental factors may also play a role in the onset of disease in genetically susceptible individuals (Silman et al., 1993). Of patients having type I diabetes, about 95% have HLA-DR3 or DR4 haplotypes or both as compared to 40% of the general population (Rotter et al., 1983).

It has also been shown that cytotoxic T lympocytes recognize an HLA-A2-restricted epitope within the hepatitis B virus nucleocapsid antigen (Penna et al., 1991). More recently it has been shown that MHC class I-restricted responses as well as class II restricted responses may also be involved in the pathogenesis of demyelinating disorders (Pelfrey et al., 1993; Tsuchida et al., 1994). In multiple sclerosis, myelin proteins are thought to be the targets for auto-reactive T-cell responses. In studies by Tsuchida et al. (1994) it was found that self peptides derived from human myelin proteins (including sequences from human myelin basic protein, proteolipid protein, myelin associated glycoprotein and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein) bind to and form stable complexes with HLA-A2. These studies are important because they demonstrate that self peptides from human myelin proteins can induce auto-reactive CD8 cytoxic lymphocytes and that these lymphocytes produce cytokines thought to be important in mediating demyelinating diseases.

3. Role of MHC genes in immune response to HBsAg of virus and vaccine.

It has long been known that there is a genetic correlation of the immune response with respect to the hepatitis B surface antigen (Milich et al., 1982, 1983). It has been clearly documented that the human antibody response to the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) vaccine is associated with the major histocompatability complex (MHC) and is inherited in a dominant fashion (Craven et al., 1985; Kramer et al., 1988; Alper et al., 1989; Varla-Leftherioti et al., 1990; Kruskall et al., 1992). It has further been reported that 5 to 10% of healthy individuals fail to respond ("non-responders") to the plasma-derived HBV vaccine (Weissman et al., 1988, Kramer et al., 1988). Because the plasma derived vaccine contains a distinct glycosylation pattern from that of the yeast-produced vaccine, these investigators carried out studies to evaluate whether the recombinant, yeast- produced vaccine would produce antibody titers in the non-responder population. These studies demonstrated that the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (Recombivax HB) in non-responders to the plasma derived vaccine and that HLA subtyping showed a high prevalence of DR7, B8, and the combinations of DR3, DR4 and DR7.

Additional studies by Margot et al. (1992) indicate that:

  1. the response to the HBsAg vaccine is MHC-linked and inherited in a dominant fashion,

  2. that an abnormal or missing immune response (Ir) gene for HBsAg is a characteristic of most examples of the extended haplotype (HLA-B8, SCO1, DR3), and

  3. other haplotypes also have abnormal or missing Ir genes for HBsAg.

Sktachowski, et al., (1995) have also shown that that responder groups can be divided into two subgroups: low responders and high responders. In these studies marked differences were observed between responders and non-responders in the occurrence of carriers of different MHC class I, II and III alleles. High responders were found to have different haplotypes than low responders. These findings indicate that amounts of antibody to HBsAg is genetically influenced even in patients demonstrating adequate antibody response.

Many of these studies have been summarized by Abbas (1994). His work indicates that Caucasians who are homozygous for an extended HLA haplotype containing HLA B8, DR3, Dqw2a are low responders to the HBsAg. In this review he proposed that individuals who are heterozygous for this locus are high responders presumably because the other alleles contain one or more HLA genes that confer responsiveness. Abbas et al therefore concludes that HLA typing may prove to be valuable for predicting the success of this vaccine (Abbas et al., 1994) . This proposal therefore hypothesizes that HLA typing may also prove to be valuable for predicting the failure of the vaccine, including non-response or autoimmune side effects.

D. Association of the hepatitis B surface antigen vaccine and autoimmune syndromes.

Although there have been numerous reports of the efficacy of the hepatitis B plasma and recombinant vaccines (Mast and Alter, 1983; Hollinger et al., 1986; Zahrandnik et. al., 1987; McMahon and Wainright, 1993), these reports concentrate primarily on antibody titers (e.g. responders and non-responders); and no long term follow-up has been reported. The clinical trials reported in the drug inserts cite 4 or 5 day follow-ups, which could be expected to be too short an observation period to observe long term autoimmune responses. Table 2 includes a representation of published reports of such adverse reactions although it does not include summation of the tens of thousands of reactions reported to the FDA Adverse Reaction Reporting System. We have included 12 pages representative of 900 total pages of those reaction reports (Merck vaccine only) (See Appendix 1). Note: one listing is a report by a registered nurse of 15 incidences of multiple scleroses; she inquires whether there is any known relationship with this vaccine.

To date, the most detailed study which has demonstrated a correlation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with the hepatitis B vaccine and a relationship to HLA subtypes is that of the two Co-P.I.s of this project . RA is not listed as a potential side effect for this vaccine in the Physician Desk Reference or package insert for the Energix (Smith Kline) vaccine. This study is summarized in the Progress Report and is provided in complete form in Appendix 2.

Table 2. Reports of Adverse Reactions of Hepatitis B Vaccine (does not include the FDA Adverse Reactions Reports).

Adverse Reaction/Diagnosis Reference

Systemic "Lupoid hepatitis", Lupus erythematosus See Appendix 2;
Tudela and Bonal, 1992;
Mamoux and Dumont, 1994;

Arthritis (polyarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis) Rogerson and Nye, 1990;
Vautier and Carty; 1993;
Gross et al., 1995;
Pope et al., 1995;
(see Appendix 2 and 3);
Biasi, 1987-1993.

Vascular Disorders (Vasculitis, polyarteritis, erythema nodosum, cryoglobulinemia) DiGuisto and Bernhard. (1986);
Goolsby, 1989;
Cockwell et al., 1990;
Rogerson and Nye, 1990;
Mathieu et al., 1996;
Caarmeli and De-Medina, 1993;
Isla, 1993;
Mathieu and Krivitsky, 1996.

Guillain Barre Syndrome Shaw et al., 1988;
Demyelinating disorders (optic neuritis, Bells Palsy, demyelinating neouropathy, multiple schlerosis etc.) Ribera and Dukta, 1983;
Shaw et al., 1988;

Herroelen et al., 1991;
Nadler (1993);
Devin et al., 1996;
Dunbar et al., (unpublished observations); Senejoux et al., 1996;
See Appendix 2; Baglivo et al., 1996;.

Diabetes mellitus
Poutasi, 1996;
Classen, 1996;

Chronic Fatigue I. Salit (1993);
Delage et al., 1993;
Other Germanaus et al., 1995.

The majority, if not all, of these reported side effects of the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine are the same as or similar to those reported as extra-hepatic manifestations of the virus infection itself. These severe adverse side effects are also associated with autoimmune responses. Some of these reported adverse reactions have been dismissed (e.g. Canadian Laboratory Centre for Disease Control report, Delage et al., 1992) because:

  1. there was no clear pattern of the onset of symptoms and

  2. there was no biological evidence to support the occurrences of adverse reactions (i.e. no circulating virus).

In view of substantial new information that autoimmune disease can be induced by viral molecular mimicry, anti-idiotypic antibodies, or anti-phospholipid antibodies (see discussion below), it is apparent that the dismissal of these reactions as a result of vaccination might well have been premature.

In the text "Adverse Events of Childhood Vaccines", (1993) Hauser et al. (1987), state: "The antibodies produced after infection with hepatitis B virus or after administration of plasma derived vaccine or recombinant vaccine are alike in terms of their ability to elicit protective determinants that are active against all subtypes of the virus..." and that "the results of the trials of recombinant vaccine are much the same as those of trials of the plasma-derived vaccine". They further stated that the studies were not designed to assess serious, rare adverse events, the total number of recipients were too small and the follow-up generally too short to detect rare or delayed, serious, adverse reactions. Finally it was pointed out that "overall the number of examples of adverse neurologic outcomes following receipt of hepatitis B vaccine are of concern, particularly those resulting in demyelinating neurologic disease".

In view of these observations and the more recent observations outlined in Table 2, it is medically crucial to evaluate the nature of the autoimmune reactions (i.e. risks) associated with the hepatitis B vaccine and to determine if individuals who will have these adverse reactions can be identified in advance of receiving the vaccine.

E. Possible molecular mechanisms for adverse reactions to the hepatitis B vaccine.

1. Molecular mimicry:

There has long been an awareness that viruses have developed evasion strategies by which they can successfully circumvent immune detection and/or effect. There have been recent studies of the molecular mechanisms that viruses use to circumvent the immune system (Lidbury, 1994). Molecular mimicry, which is one of the proposed mechanisms, has been characterized as the presence of one or more common epitopes, either linear or conformational, shared by host and microbial determinants (Dyrberg and Oldstone, 1986; Olesak, 1994).

The theory that molecular mimicry between viral and self antigens could, in some instances, initiate autoimmunity has gained increased acceptance in the past few years (Fujinami and Oldstone, 1985; Jahnke et al., 1985; Fujinami, 1988; Olesak, 1994; Wucherpfennig and Strominger, 1995; Gianani and Sarvetnick, 1996; Baughan et al., 1995). One study has provided evidence that while only one peptide could have been identified as a molecular mimic by sequence alignment, seven viral and one bacterial peptide efficiently activated T cell responses in cells isolated from patients with multiple sclerosis (Wucherpfennig and Strominger, 1995). These authors conclude that the diverse nature of the molecular mimicry peptides and the ubiquitous presence of some of these pathogens make it difficult to establish a direct epidemiological link between these viral infections and the occurrence of multiple sclerosis. These authors also conclude that: "Genetic modifications of viral vaccines that eliminate proven mimicry epitopes could make viral vaccines safer and reduce the frequency of post-vaccinal encephalomyelitis".

With respect to the hepatitis B virus, it has been shown by Fujinami and Oldstone (1985) that when computer aided analysis identified peptide sequences shared between the viral protein and myelin basic protein (MBP), these peptides could stimulate a T cell proliferative response directed to MBP and result in autoimmune central nervous system disease in rabbits. In fact, this study of the hepatitis B protein was used as the basis for the molecular mimicry model of autoimmune disease (Barnett et al., 1993).

It has also been shown that the conformational nature of peptides may be important for conferring molecular mimicry (Madden et al., 1993). It is clear that detailed molecular and biochemical analyses need to be carried out to identify specific peptides which might be acting as molecular mimics. The advances in computer technology and data bases now provide the tools necessary to design experiments to evaluate these hypotheses directly.

2. Anti-idiotypic antibodies.

Anti-idotypic antibodies are associated with autoimmune disorders including myasthenia gravis, diabetes, systemic lupus and Grave's disease (Nasu, et al., 1982; Rauch et al., 1985; Dwyer et al., 1983,1987; Sikorska, 1986; Schoelson et al., 1986), as has been demonstrated directly in experimental animal models (Shoenfeld, 1994; Blank et al., 1995). It has been proposed from these results that in some autoimmune diseases, especially in those in which the presumed auto-antigen is not immunogenic (e.g. DNA, cardiolipin), that antibodies against the infecting agent may carry a pathogenic idiotype of a specific auto-antibody (Schoenfeld, 1994). The latter author has further hypothesized that, if a subject is prone to autoimmunity (e.g. genetic, hormonal), the pathogenic idiotype will progress in dysregulating the immune system resulting in a clinically overt autoimmune disease.

Autoantibodies that are anti-idiotypic to anti-viral antibodies have also been observed (Plotz, 1983). Furthermore, anti-idiotypic reagents that bear an internal image capable of mimicking the hepatitis B surface antigen have been used to induce an antibody response to HBsAg in both rabbits and chimpanzees (Kennedy et al., 1986). Also in vivo injections of anti-idiotypic antibodies have been used to prime the immune response of mice to HBsAg (Kennedy et al., 1984). Given the correlation of anti-idiotypic antibodies with antigens known to be associated with molecular mimicry, the probability that such antibodies are involved in the adverse reactions associated with hepatitis B vaccination appears high and needs to be addressed in detail as is proposed in this study.

c. Anti-phospholipid antibodies.

Recently, anti-phospholipid antibodies have been shown to be associated with clinical syndromes such as SEL and thrombosis (Puurunen et al., 1996), recurrent abortion and thrombocytopenia. Other reports include a relationship to multiple sclerosis (Sugiyama and Yamamoto, 1996). It has been shown recently that there is an increased incidence of anti-cardiolipin antibodies in patients having autoimmune thyroid diseases, although these autoantibodies are thought to represent a non-specific marker of immune dysregulation. Other studies have described autoimmune phenomena in which anti-phospholipid antibodies are associated with "anti-phospholipid syndrome" (Lekarstvi, 1994), and there has been a report of a patient with mixed types of chronic active hepatitis and primary bilary cirrhosis having this syndrome (Saeki et al., 1993). In addition, it has been shown that anti-phospholipid antibodies in women with recurrent fetal loss correlate to clinical and serological characteristics of SLE (Bagger et al., 1993, Zurgil et al., 1993). One of the patients who will be participating in this study had recurrent miscarriages following the onset of adverse reactions to the hepatitis B vaccine and had noted anti-cardiolipin antibodies (See Appendix 2) A proposed mechanism for anti-phospholipid antibodies involved in autoimmune diseases has been derived from observations that heparin sulfate is a high affinity antigen of pathological significance for anti-DNA and anti-phospholipid antibodies. Interference due to binding of these antibodies with components of the cell surface and heparin sulfate, which is an extracellular matrix molecule, could play a major role in tissue injury including the vasculature system (Shibata et al., 1993). As vascular problems are a common adverse effect of the HBsAg, this will be an important parameter to evaluate.

The hepatitis B surface antigen binds to a human liver plasma membrane protein, endonexin II, a calcium dependent phospholipid binding protein (deBruin et al., 1996). This protein has further been shown to be associated with numerous tissue cell types. They conclude that the species specific distribution of the HBsAg binding protein correlates with the species tropism of hepatitis B virus infection. Because this protein is not present in species which are not infected with this virus, the binding to this surface molecule might be important in the mechanisms of cellular internalization of this HBsAg. There is also a correlation of anti-phospholipid antibodies in some patients who have been exposed to the HBsAg and the prevalence of demyelinating autoimmune disorders. Thus it is possible that the binding of HBsAg to this phospholipid binding protein may be related to cellular internalization during immune processing of the peptide and may be related to some of the reported adverse reactions.

III. Preliminary Data and Progress Report

A. Risk vs. benefit of Hepatitis B vaccine.

For any vaccine, it is critical to evaluate the risk/benefit ratio to determine the efficacy, safety and practicality of the vaccine. We have initiated investigations to evaluate the risk (i.e. adverse vaccine reactions) vs. the benefits of this vaccine. Based on well respected published values from the major text used in U.S. medical schools (Crawford, 1994), as well as values from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) of the incidence and clinical manifestations of this disease the following estimations of vaccine efficacy have been calculated.

1. Estimation of the risk of contracting hepatitis B in U.S.

It is commonly reported by drug company brochures and Center for Disease Control (CDC) publications (Hadler and Margolis, 1993) that there are 200,000 to 300,000 cases of hepatitis B per year in the United States. There are arguments on the internet attributed to the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (internet: www.i-wayco.com/niin/van/van_p5.html) argue that the number of cases may be lower. In this reference, it is reported that in 1992 there were 358 reports of Hepatitis B in New York City and 438 in Upstate New York and only 13,857 cases nationwide. The broad range of estimated cases of hepatitis B in the United States is clearly a problem in assessing the risk of contracting hepatitis B in this country. That problem is compounded by three apparent additional problems:

  1. the fact that the majority of these cases appear confined to I-V drug users, sexually promiscuous persons, and medical contacts;

  2. the genetic predisposition of some exposed to the hepatitis B virus to fend it off without serious illness; and

  3. contraction of the disease by non-responders to the vaccine after vaccination.

Our best assessment of the risk is outlined in Table 3. As best we can we take into account the worst and best case scenarios from the above information and assume that every individual has the same risk (i.e. there is no difference in risk between the normal population and high risk categories such as drug users). This assessment is also based on the averages of clinical populations of this disease outlined by Crawford, (1994). Clearly, the risk would be greatly reduced if the distinction between the normal population and high risk categories was established. Furthermore, these numbers might vary if it was possible to assess how many non-responders to the vaccine contract the virus and have subsequent serious symptoms or die.


Table 3. Estimated relative risk of severe disease of death from Hepatitis B in United States.

 

Cases per year in US Worst Case 300,000 (1% of total pop.) Best Case 14,000 (.005% of total pop.) % of Infected
Cases recovered 250,000+ 11,520+ 83%+
Healthy Carriers 15,000-30,000+ 750-1400+ 10%+
Fulminant hepatitis, cirrhosis and carcinoma, and death 2500 116 0.83%
Estimated Risk of serious illness or death 265,000,000** 0.0009% 0.000044%

**(Current US Population)


2. Estimation for risk of adverse side effects of Hepatitis B recombinant vaccine (From Physicians' Desk Reference, 1995).

Although there are over 60 listed potential adverse reactions of "less than 1%", it is not clear if this is less than 1% of each of the listed effects or less that 1% of all 60 potential reactions.

        a. Recombivax HB, Merck, Inc. - quoted directly from 1997 Physician's Desk Reference

(PDR INSERT)

        b. Energix Smith Kline Beecham - quoted directly from 1997 Physician's Desk Reference

(PDR INSERT)

        c. Adverse Reaction Reports to Food and Drug Administration.

The P.I. has obtained from the FDA a list of adverse reactions reported for Merck's Recombix HB vaccine from 1990 through part of 1996. Over 7000 adverse reactions are listed. A dozen representative pages of these reports are included in Appendix 1. It has been informally estimated that there may actually be upwards of 30,000 adverse reaction reports for both the Merck Recombivax and the Smith Kline Energex vaccines. Because the FDA reports that these adverse reactions constitute only 10% of adverse reactions, it can be assumed that there may be tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of adverse reactions to these vaccines to date. Without direct access to the computer data bases from which these lists are derived, it has not been possible for the P.I. or her colleagues to obtain precise estimates of autoimmune reactions to the two vaccines.

However, the vast majority of these severe autoimmune reactions are known to be related to immune phenomena. These types of devastating immune disorders require extensive long term health care. Thus even a small percentage of effects could considerably increase the expense of health care in the U.S. Furthermore, the devastating effect on the length and quality of life for those adversely effected should not be ignored.

In view of these observations, there are critical questions which need to be addressed to establish the risk/ benefit of the current hepatitis B vaccines in the United States. These questions are particularly important in view of recent mandates to vaccinate all children including newborn infants. The issues include:

  1. Is four or five days of observation as in the FDA clinical trials, adequate to evaluate potential autoimmune side effects of the recombinant hepatitis B vaccines?
  2. Would the percentage of detected autoimmune reactions to the recombinant vaccines increase if a follow-up of 30 days or longer was carried out in vaccinated trial patients? If so, how much?
  3. Would evaluation of MHC class subtypes correlate to reported incidences of autoimmune reactions to the vaccines? If so, would it be possible to predict which of those MHC class subtypes could be expected to have an autoimmune reaction to the vaccine?
  4. Could identification of peptides in the HBsAg, which are responsible for adverse reaction, result in re-engineering the vaccine to eliminate autoimmune reactions?
  5. If specific immune responses are identified (e.g. antibodies to specific self peptides), can specific autoimmune responses be regulated (i.e. immunosupression) so that effective treatment can be designed for those patients who have long term serious adverse effects to the vaccine?
  6. How many patients have serious illness or die of cirrhosis or carcinoma would (or did) NOT respond to the recombinant vaccine due to MHC class non-responsiveness and therefore would not be protected by these vaccines? Can they be identified? If so, the alternative of immunoglobulin therapy or some other drug therapy might be more appropriate than the misleading these patients as to the potential of the vaccines.

B. Identification and evaluation of patients with adverse effects to the Hepatitis B vaccine.

To date, few studies have been carried out to determine the causes for the serious adverse effects associated with the Hepatitis B vaccine. In view of this limited information we have initiated studies to collect serum from patients throughout the course of these adverse reactions and to collect additional information to design studies to adequately address these issues.

        1. Correlation of onset of arthritis with the recombinant hepatitis vaccine. Two of the Co-P.I.'s have carried out extensive studies following 12 patients who have had long term adverse reactions resulting in arthritis (See Appendix 2). In summary these studies show that 11/12 cases had persistent arthritis up to 48 months. HLA class II genes expressing the Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) shared motif were identified in 9 of 12 patients who were genotyped for HLA DRß1 and DQß1 alleles. These studies provide substantial justification for carrying out further studies to determine the risk of RA as a consequence of hepatitis B vaccination.

        2. Collection of serum samples for analysis of onset of autoimmune syndrome. . In addition to the long term studies following patients with RA, we have identified numerous other patients whose symptoms are either demyelinating disorders or "mixed connective tissue disorders." We have already obtained serum samples from some of these patients whose symptoms and onset of disease are directly related to a time frame that is consistent which an adverse immune reaction to this vaccine. Detailed reports from physicians have established definite correlation with the vaccine have been obtained or will be provided for these patients (See Appendix 2). Because one of these patients was working in the P.I.'s laboratory during the onset of these reactions we have had collected and have frozen monthly bleedings from 3 through 6 months after the immunization during the onset of autoimmune adverse reactions from one of these patients (demyelinating disease, encephylopathy, joint pain, lupus-like syndrome). In addition, we have additional bleedings following two years at the time when symptoms have persisted. We have not yet evaluated this serum in detail because it is so valuable and therefore serious consideration as to the priority of experiments will be assessed as these studies progress. These samples are critical in that it demonstrates the potential to prospectively evaluate the onset and evolution of autoimmune disease at a relatively early stage and provides an opportunity to determine what immunological parameters might exist at different stages.

C. Preparation and characterization of monoclonal antibodies and anti-idiotypic antibodies to evaluate adverse reactions to the hepatitis B vaccine. In order to evaluate the immune response to the HBsAg, a number of different studies have been carried out by the a Co-P.I. of this project and his colleagues. A variety of monoclonal and anti-idiotypic antibodies to the HBsAg have been reported in detail. (Kennedy et al., 1982; Kennedy and Dreesman, 1983; Kennedy et al., 1983; Kennedy et al., 1986). In recent studies direct binding and competitive inhibition enzyme immunoassays have demonstrated that two murine monoclonal antibodies to HBsAg (A1.2 and A3.1) recognize similar or overlapping epitopes while the A2.1 antibody recognizes a unique HBsAg epitope. Further analysis using monoclonal and polyclonal anti-idiotypic reagents have identified both a private and cross-reactive idiotype, respectively on the anti-HBs A1.2 and A3.1. ( see details in Shearer et al., Appendix 4) These panels antibodies and reagents will be critical for characterizing the antibodies in the serum of patients have severe reactions to the HBsAg vaccine.

D. Comparison of amino acid sequences of HBsAg with peptides associated with demyelinating autoimmune diseases. Recent reports have shown that (a) self peptides from human myelin proteins can induce auto-reactive CD8+ Cytotoxic T cells and that these T cells produce cytokines thought to be important in mediating demyelinating disease (Tsuchida et al., 1994);

  1. proliferative and cytolytic CD4+ T cells from multiple sclerosis patients recognize myelin proteolipid proteins (Pelfrey et al., 1993), and

  2. that viral peptides activate human T cell clones specific for myelin basic proteins, and

  3. that viral peptides can activate human T cell clones specific for myelin basic protein. (Wucherpfennig and Strominger, 1995).

In view of these reports, we have initiated studies to evaluate the similarities and identifies of peptide sequences of the HBsAg and myelin protein peptides thought to be important in demyelinating disease.

TABLE 4 : Comparison of amino acid sequences of peptides 1 derived from human myelin proteins (that are targets of auto-reactive T-cell responses and implicated in demyelinating disorders) to HBsAg.

 

PEPTIDE(amino acid position) % SIMILARITY / % IDENTITY AMINO ACID POSITION IN HBsAg
2PLP40-60 75 / 35 116-165
PLP80-88 75 / 63 83-90
PLP253-261 89 / 33 171-185
3MAG8-16 78 / 44 11-30
MAG406-414 71 / 57 162-168
MAG509-517 89 / 44 175-190
MAG556-564 78 / 33 190-200
4MBP110-118 100 / 67 31-45
5MOG7-15 88 / 50 87-94
MOG133-141 75 / 25 21-28
MOG157-165 78 / 22 24-32
MOG164-172 71 / 43 203-209
MOG221-229 71 / 57 204-212
MOG240-248 75 / 25 15-24
MOG442-430 78 / 33 13-21

1Tsuchida et al (1994); Pelfrey et al (1993). Peptides bind to HLA-A2.

2PLP = Proteolipid protein; 3MAG = Myelin-associated glycoprotein

4MBP = Myelin basic protein; 5MOG = Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein

These studies show that there are some HBsAg peptides which have strikingly similar regions to the myelin proteins. Detailed studies by Wucherpfennig and Strominger, (1995) that a single T cell receptor can recognize quite distinct but structurally related peptides from multiple pathogens. It will, therefore, be critical in the present studies to carry out more detailed structural analysis to identify peptide motifs as described by these investigators.

Page 1    Page 2    Page 3    Page 4


©2003 Vaccination Risk Awareness Network Inc.  All rights reserved.  
The contents of this publication reflect the opinion of the authors only. This publication is for informational purposes only. Opinions expressed should not be construed as medical advice. The particulars of any person's concerns and circumstances should be discussed with a qualified health care practitioner prior to making any decision which may affect the health and welfare of that individual or anyone under his or her care. 

WebDesign by ComTech Designs - Associates and its licensors